Friday, March 31, 2017

Week 8



I spent this week learning about MACRA, the legislation to be implemented in 2019 that will reward healthcare providers based on their quality of care. The Quality Payment Program makes Medicare better by helping providers focus on care quality and the one thing that matters most – making patients healthier. The Quality Payment Program ends the Sustainable Growth Rate formula and gives you new tools, models, and resources to help give patients the best possible care. Hospitals can choose how you want to take part based on your practice size, specialty, location, or patient population.

The push to pay for quality, not quantity in health care is rapidly accelerating. Doctors and hospitals are being evaluated on myriad quality metrics by rating services, insurance companies, professional groups and government programs—with results increasingly tied to financial penalties or bonuses.

But payers, providers and patients don’t always agree on what quality means, and there is no official set of standards.


The quality programs grew out of two realizations: Health care is unsafe and outcomes are poor. But there is no single measure of a doctor’s or hospital’s quality that will fix those problems. Instead, we’re measuring processes. Of the 123 different metrics in the government’s Hospital Compare website, 102 measure processes. That’s important, but it has become too burdensome for the benefit it delivers.

Quality should focus on the functional outcomes that mean the most to patients. For a patient who got a knee replacement, can she walk and climb steps? For a man having prostate surgery, can we operate without causing incontinence and impotence? To find the keys, and not just look in good light, we need to track and report functional outcomes across all patients by each team or hospital.

10 comments:

  1. Hi, Manu. I enjoyed your post. Do you think this piece of legislation will make health care more effective?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Manu. I enjoyed reading your post. So does MACRA seek to stop wasting money on healthcare that is not actually efficient, and does it look to increase both quantity and quality of healthcare?

    ReplyDelete
  3. As with all legislation, the execution and implementation is just as important as the effects of the law. In this case, is MACRA planned to be introduced slowly and bit-by-bit starting in 2019, or is it going to change everything at once? And are medical institutions like Banner already preparing to make that change, or are they putting it off until later?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Manu. What do you personally see as potential drawbacks of MACRA, and what does it mean for healthcare providers?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey Manu thanks for the interesting post. But now since there has been a shift in politics, will it conflict against the effectivity of the Quality Payment Program?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey Manu. do you believe this new piece of legislation, MACRA, will be effective in what it is trying to achieve? Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey Manu,

    Really liked your blog! Keep up the good work.....see you next time. Good luck!!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey Manu! You seem to be learning lots of new information every week. I have a few questions about the legislation. Will it be implemented for sure even if our health care system changes? Also do you think that this new legislation will be effective or not? Why? Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Is MACRA actually going to be enacted? It seems like this piece of legislation is adverse to the stance of the Trump Administration, especially on trying to cut back on social welfare programs. Is there a possibility of this being repealed?

    ReplyDelete
  10. I was kinda of surprised to hear that there are 123 different metrics. Are they all necessary?

    ReplyDelete